As individuals approach their retirement years, the task of drafting their wills and asset distribution becomes paramount. Among the myriad questions, one of the most significant is whether Will beneficiaries should be treated equally.

While the concept of equality appears to epitomize fairness, real-world complexities often challenge this notion.

Advocating for Equality

  1. Mitigating Family Conflict: Treating all children equally can serve as a proactive measure to avert potential conflicts or lingering resentment. Money has the potential to be a divisive issue, and perceived favoritism may strain sibling relationships.
  2. Simplicity: Embracing equality offers simplicity in execution. Dividing assets evenly leaves little room for ambiguity or misinterpretation.
  3. Fairness as a Guiding Principle: For many, the decision to treat children equally in a will reflects deeply held values. It communicates a message that parental love and appreciation are equitable, irrespective of individual life choices or circumstances.

Justified Unequal Shares

While equal treatment  is commonly advocated, there are circumstances where unequal distribution of assets can be justified:

  1. Financial Disparities: If one child is financially stable, while another has faced significant hardships or has additional needs, such as a disability, some parents choose to provide more to the child who may benefit most from additional financial support.
  2. Prior Financial Assistance: If you’ve already provided substantial financial aid to one child during your lifetime, such as covering an expensive education, assisting with a home purchase, or supporting them through a crisis, it may be reasonable to adjust your will to account for these disparities.
  3. Caregiving Roles: In cases where one child has assumed a primary caregiving role, especially if it resulted in career sacrifices, some parents may consider compensating them for their time and effort.
  4. Relationships: Though uncomfortable, not all parents share the same level of closeness with each of their children. Some parents may choose to allocate more to those with whom they had stronger bonds or who were more involved in their lives.
  5. Encouraging Responsibility: In situations where parents are concerned about a child’s ability to manage a substantial inheritance due to addiction issues or financial irresponsibility, structured inheritances or trusts can be established to provide support while safeguarding the inheritance.

Deciding whether unequal shares are justified should be a thoughtful and transparent process that aligns with your specific family dynamics, values, and goals for the well-being of your beneficiaries.

Crucial Considerations

  1. Open Communication: If you are contemplating unequal treatment of your children in your will, it is advisable to have candid discussions with them. Clear communication can preempt misunderstandings and minimize the potential for posthumous conflicts. Sharing your reasons and intentions can promote family harmony.
  2. Professional Guidance: Estate planning can be intricate, and the legal and financial intricacies should not be underestimated. Engaging the services of a financial advisor and an attorney can provide valuable insights, ensure that your wishes are legally documented, and navigate complex regulations.
  3. Periodic Review: Life is ever-changing, and circumstances evolve. Regularly revisit your will to assess whether the allocations still align with your intentions and your children’s current needs. Flexibility and adaptability are key to maintaining an equitable plan.

Ultimately, the decision of whether to treat your children equally in your will is a deeply personal one. What matters most is that the distribution of your assets resonates with your values, intentions, and the unique dynamics of your family. It’s essential to recognize that equality does not always equate to fairness, and the “right” decision is the one that aligns most closely with your vision for your family’s future.

 

Copyright © 2023 FMeX. All rights reserved. Distributed by Financial Media Exchange.
Ethos Capital Management, Inc. (ECM) is a registered investment adviser. The firm only conducts business in states where it is properly registered or is excluded from registration requirements. Registration is not an endorsement of the firm by securities regulators and does not mean the adviser has achieved a specific level of skill or ability.
Commentary should not be regarded as a complete analysis of the subjects discussed. All expressions of opinion reflect the judgment of the author on the date of publication and are subject to change. The information presented does not involve the rendering of personalized investment and should not be viewed as an offer to buy or sell any securities discussed. Articles were prepared by a third party and were distributed by Financial Media Exchange, which is not affiliated with ECM.
All investment strategies have the potential for profit or loss. Different types of investments involve higher and lower levels of risk. There is no guarantee that a specific investment or strategy will be suitable or profitable for an investor’s portfolio. Historical performance returns for investment indexes and/or categories, usually do not deduct transaction and/or custodial charges or an advisory fee, which would decrease historical performance results. Returns do not reflect the performance of ECM or any of its advisory clients. There are no assurances that a portfolio will match or exceed any particular benchmark. Asset allocation and diversification will not necessarily improve an investor’s returns and cannot eliminate the risk of investment losses.
The tax information provided is general in should not be construed as legal or tax advice. Information is derived from sources deemed to be reliable. Always consult an attorney or tax professional regarding your specific legal or tax situation. Tax rules and regulations are subject to change at any time.